FTC Unseals Amazon Ads Surcharge Claims: What Sellers Should Do
Newly unredacted FTC filings allege Amazon quietly pushed ad prices up to 50% above auction results on normal days, and 250% during events like Prime Day. Amazon denies the claims, but the allegations matter for how you read past campaign data.
Rajesh Kumar · 6 Nov 2026 · 3 min read

- The FTC and 22 state attorneys general unsealed details alleging Amazon secretly raised ad prices up to 50% on normal days and up to 250% during major shopping events.
- Examples include a 20% average CPC increase in the 2021 holidays, an alleged $87 million in extra revenue in 2022, and a 100%+ increase for one advertiser on Prime Day 2023.
- The case centers on soft reserve prices; Amazon denies wrongdoing and says advertisers never pay more than their maximum bid.
- These are allegations in ongoing litigation, and it is unclear whether the practices continued after 2023.
- Review 2021-2023 peak-event benchmarks and separate CPC changes from conversion rate during upcoming sales.
What happened
The Federal Trade Commission and 22 state attorneys general have filed an updated complaint against Amazon with previously redacted sections now visible. The case, filed in the Western District of Washington, alleges Amazon covertly raised the prices advertisers paid in its search ad auctions. According to a report from Search Engine Journal, the unsealed material adds specific numbers and internal discussions to the original lawsuit.
The complaint alleges Amazon pushed prices up to 50% above auction results on ordinary days. During major shopping events such as Prime Day and Black Friday, the alleged increases reached 250%.
The examples that stand out
The unsealed sections cover 2021 to 2023:
- 2021 holiday season: average CPC allegedly rose 20%, with some advertisers seeing increases above 200%.
- 2022 holiday season: Amazon allegedly raised its hidden surcharges to generate an extra $87 million in worldwide revenue.
- Prime Day 2023: a large food and beverage advertiser allegedly faced increases of more than 100%. The complaint says Amazon internally acknowledged the increases were "destroying campaign performance."
The complaint also links the mechanism to revenue goals. It quotes an email from the head of Amazon Ads asking for help closing gaps to plan, with at least $40 million from reserves described as helpful.
How the mechanism works
The case centers on "soft reserve prices." These are not minimum bids. They can lift the final CPC above what competing bids would have produced. Amazon's position is that advertisers can win placements below the soft reserve and pay their bid, and that no one pays more than their maximum bid. The company has denied deceiving or harming advertisers and defended its reserve pricing in its response to the original suit.
The FTC's argument is that Amazon used undisclosed reserve pricing to raise charges while describing the auctions in misleading terms.
The explanation problem
The complaint also describes advertisers asking Amazon whether the auction had changed. In one instance, an advertiser asked whether something had changed in the second-price process, by design or mistake. The FTC alleges the account manager said there was no bug and no change in auction style, and blamed a more crowded marketplace.
That matters because campaign reports show what you paid and what you got back. They do not show how the final CPC was calculated. If the allegations hold up, advertisers were reading cost spikes as market competition when part of the cause was a pricing lever they could not see.
Why this matters for sellers and agencies
These are allegations, not findings. The case is still being litigated, and Amazon has not publicly responded to the newly unsealed details. The source also notes the FTC's summary doesn't say whether the practices continued past 2023 or exactly which ad formats were affected, although earlier FTC materials mention alleged conduct in 2024 and name Sponsored Products, Sponsored Brands and Display Ads.
Even so, the practical impact is real. Many teams use 2021 to 2023 peak-season data as a benchmark. If those periods contain inflated costs, your targets for CPC, ROAS and ACoS may be skewed.
What to do now
- Audit your peak-event baselines. Look at CPC and ROAS from Prime Day and Q4 in 2021 to 2023. Flag those windows in your reporting instead of treating them as normal.
- Brief stakeholders with context. If you had to explain a ROAS drop to a client or finance team, the unsealed allegations give you documented background. Present them as allegations, not settled fact.
- Split CPC from conversion rate. During Black Friday and Cyber Monday, track CPC, conversion rate and impression share side by side. That shows whether a weaker result comes from click costs or from shoppers buying less.
- Don't depend on one channel. Amazon Ads is often the highest-intent paid channel for sellers, but opaque pricing is a reason to test other sources of demand. Look at Google Shopping, email, and your own site's organic and AI search visibility.
- Keep your own records. Save screenshots and exports of CPC and spend during peak events. If the case produces any remedy, clean records will help you.
What to watch next
Keep an eye on Amazon's formal response to the unsealed material and any court rulings on reserve pricing. Also watch for any change in how Amazon documents its auction rules, since more transparency would help you judge whether a cost spike is competition or pricing policy.
Raj's takeI wouldn't treat this as proven yet, but it should change how you read your Amazon data. Peak-season CPC spikes were commonly written off as 'more competition', and that explanation may not have been the full story. Keep your own records, question old benchmarks, and don't let one opaque auction decide your whole ecommerce growth plan.
Want this applied to your business?
Related

Funding Full-Funnel Retail Media Across Three Budgets
Retail media rarely belongs to one budget owner. A MarTech piece points to a practical problem: coordinating brand, paid media and retail media funding without losing team goals or hiding annual retailer commitments.

Alexa for Shopping Hits 400M Users: What Sellers Must Do Now
Amazon says over 400 million customers used Alexa for Shopping in the past 12 months, and those users spend 50% more. For brands, the AI shopping assistant is becoming a new storefront layer inside a walled garden.

AI Shopping Visibility: Fix Your Product Data First
A Search Engine Journal webinar recap shows AI shopping tools need product data that bots can retrieve, shoppers' language, and feeds that match pages. Here is what ecommerce teams can do now.
