<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Internet Marketing &#187; Internet Marketing (SEO &amp; SEM)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://marketingbyraj.com/category/search-engine-optimization/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://marketingbyraj.com</link>
	<description>Your Internet Business Partner</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 May 2012 15:22:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Did Google’s Search Results Get Better Or Worse?</title>
		<link>http://marketingbyraj.com/2012/04/26/did-googles-search-results-get-better-or-worse/</link>
		<comments>http://marketingbyraj.com/2012/04/26/did-googles-search-results-get-better-or-worse/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2012 16:22:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>raj</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Internet Marketing (SEO & SEM)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEO/SEM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search Engine]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marketingbyraj.com/?p=2145</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Google’s latest search algorithm change designed to fight spam and improve its search results went live yesterday. Plenty of people are seeing its impact already. Better or worse? It’s easy to find some examples of things being bad; it’s hard to say overall if there’s been a net improvement or not. Judging Relevancy Is Tricky [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://marketingbyraj.com/2012/04/26/did-googles-search-results-get-better-or-worse/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Faking A Breadcrumb Trail To Stand Out On Google</title>
		<link>http://marketingbyraj.com/2012/04/26/faking-a-breadcrumb-trail-to-stand-out-on-google/</link>
		<comments>http://marketingbyraj.com/2012/04/26/faking-a-breadcrumb-trail-to-stand-out-on-google/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2012 16:09:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>raj</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Internet Marketing (SEO & SEM)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEO/SEM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marketingbyraj.com/?p=2141</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Google Rich Snippets are an outstanding way for webmasters to get more exposure for their pages in the Google search results. Using them, you can add add images, review stars and more to your listings. But for some webmasters, that is not enough. Back in November I noticed HTML entities working in Google’s breadcrumb rich [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://marketingbyraj.com/2012/04/26/faking-a-breadcrumb-trail-to-stand-out-on-google/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>No, Bing Doesn’t Support Pagination Attributes to Consolidate Pages In A Series</title>
		<link>http://marketingbyraj.com/2012/04/26/no-bing-doesnt-support-pagination-attributes-to-consolidate-pages-in-a-series/</link>
		<comments>http://marketingbyraj.com/2012/04/26/no-bing-doesnt-support-pagination-attributes-to-consolidate-pages-in-a-series/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2012 16:00:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>raj</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Internet Marketing (SEO & SEM)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marketingbyraj.com/?p=2136</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Last week, the Bing Webmaster blog published a post about how Bing handles rel=”next” and rel=”prev” attributes. On the surface, it seemed as though Bing was announcing that it now supported these tags in the same way Google does. Last September, Google announced support of the rel=”prev” and rel=”next” attributes to designate paginated content, which enables [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://marketingbyraj.com/2012/04/26/no-bing-doesnt-support-pagination-attributes-to-consolidate-pages-in-a-series/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Online Marketing Company Reveals Revolutionary Google Button</title>
		<link>http://marketingbyraj.com/2012/04/02/online-marketing-company-reveals-revolutionary-google-button/</link>
		<comments>http://marketingbyraj.com/2012/04/02/online-marketing-company-reveals-revolutionary-google-button/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Apr 2012 04:33:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>raj</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Internet Marketing (SEO & SEM)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Latest Web News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marketingbyraj.com/?p=2069</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[7PressRelease/ &#8212; In a web marketing breakthrough, Sector45 has announced the launch of its magic &#8220;Rank Me #1&#8243; Google Button (http://www.thegooglebutton.com). Effectively rendering all previous methods of SEO and web marketing obsolete, the Google Button allows anyone in the world to be ranked first in search engine&#8217;s results. &#8220;The Google Button will change how the web works,&#8221; [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://marketingbyraj.com/2012/04/02/online-marketing-company-reveals-revolutionary-google-button/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cookiegate Another Privacy Black Eye For Google</title>
		<link>http://marketingbyraj.com/2012/02/19/cookiegate-another-privacy-black-eye-for-google/</link>
		<comments>http://marketingbyraj.com/2012/02/19/cookiegate-another-privacy-black-eye-for-google/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Feb 2012 02:32:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>raj</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Internet Marketing (SEO & SEM)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marketingbyraj.com/?p=2010</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Call it “Cookiegate” — or “Safarigate” perhaps. Late last night we got the Wall Street Journal’s piece: “Google’s iPhone Tracking: Web Giant, Others Bypassed Apple Browser Settings for Guarding Privacy.” Danny covered the article and its claims extensively at Marketing Land. This morning there’s an expanding debate about whether the WSJ mischaracterized Google’s behavior unfairly or whether the company has [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://marketingbyraj.com/2012/02/19/cookiegate-another-privacy-black-eye-for-google/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Guide To Finding Linkbuilding Targets With Social Media</title>
		<link>http://marketingbyraj.com/2012/02/09/guide-to-finding-linkbuilding-targets-with-social-media/</link>
		<comments>http://marketingbyraj.com/2012/02/09/guide-to-finding-linkbuilding-targets-with-social-media/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 07:31:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>raj</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Internet Marketing (SEO & SEM)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Latest Web News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marketingbyraj.com/?p=1989</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There’s been a lot of debate in the SEO community lately regarding social media versus traditional linkbuilding methods. While some SEOs argue that social media links are the wave of the SEO future, traditionalists staunchly maintain traditional, authoritative links from quality sources are still the best way to go. Whatever your stance, I think it’s [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://marketingbyraj.com/2012/02/09/guide-to-finding-linkbuilding-targets-with-social-media/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>10 Tips For Optimizing Local Business Listings In Bing</title>
		<link>http://marketingbyraj.com/2012/01/31/10-tips-for-optimizing-local-business-listings-in-bing/</link>
		<comments>http://marketingbyraj.com/2012/01/31/10-tips-for-optimizing-local-business-listings-in-bing/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 04:40:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>raj</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Internet Marketing (SEO & SEM)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEO/SEM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Latest Web News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marketingbyraj.com/?p=1972</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Local business marketers often hyper-focus on Google search rankings, but it’s important not to forget that even if Bing and Yahoo! do not have the lion’s share, even 15% of search volume can create a sizable number of potential business referrals. So, here are a few basic tips for optimizing for Bing Local search rankings. [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://marketingbyraj.com/2012/01/31/10-tips-for-optimizing-local-business-listings-in-bing/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching 4/20 queries in 0.015 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 1118/1148 objects using disk: basic

Served from: marketingbyraj.com @ 2012-05-18 04:54:59 -->
